Rupture De Stock Plaquenil Viagra Prodaja Viagra Temps De Reaction Cialis Pamplemousse Ou Acheter Du Viagra en Ligne Prix Du Generique Du Viagra

40% In opposition to Free Low-Revenue Housing, Even If It Saves Taxpayers Cash


One of the major challenges that welfare attorneys confuse is the fact that in many situations the provision of supportive welfare services saves taxpayers money. For example, several studies have shown that providing the homeless with housing costs is less than the price of relying on law enforcement to monitor the behavior of the homeless.

If the provision of services to low-income communities benefits people of all income levels, what stands in the way?

We surveyed 1,500 Americans to learn about the average person’s attitudes toward free welfare resources. Here’s what we learned:

  • Two in five people are against the provision of low-income housing, whether or not it saves taxpayers’ money
  • Around one in five would support a free housing program if it cut costs for taxpayers
  • More than a third already support free housing, regardless of taxpayers’ savings

2 in 5 Americans say no regardless of savings

A surprisingly high 40% of respondents said they would be against providing free housing to low-income communities regardless of whether taxpayers would save.

A quarter said they were against “handouts” for some reason, suggesting a deeper misunderstanding about the purpose and impact of welfare programs. In a 2019 study by the Cato Institute, 60% of those surveyed stated that welfare programs are not intended to lift people out of poverty, but rather “simply to meet people’s basic needs while they are poor”.

In reality, research shows that Housing First programs are incredibly effective in helping people escape homelessness. A 2018 report from the Urban Institute concluded that the average time spent on rapid relocation was only three months. 70% of the participants had successful access to permanent housing at the time of leaving the program.

Americans reject free housing

1 in 4 say that free living is not “fair”

The other respondents in the anti-housing program spoke out against the idea because free housing is not “fair” for some and not all.

This response suggests that many people are unaware that not housing low-income communities actually costs them money – a scenario that most would agree is even less “fair” than the alternative. An analysis by the Central Florida Commission on Homelessness found that the cost of law enforcement, emergency rooms, and jail time for unhodged communities was more than three times the cost of housing people without a home.

Taxpayers who pay two or three times more than necessary can change the perspective of those who prioritize fairness.

Half of Americans support low-income housing

More than half are in favor of free living

On the other hand, 57% of those surveyed said they support free housing programs. Over a third said they already support these programs, while the remaining 21% said they support these programs if implemented effectively to save taxpayers money.

With almost 60% already on board, this data suggests that the barriers that stand in the way of housing lawyers may be smaller than previously thought.

Last word

Learning more about people’s perspectives on different government programs can help lawmakers develop more effective strategies and help voters clarify their positions on issues. These survey results show that cost is not the main barrier to increasing support for welfare programs like low-income housing. Instead, ubiquitous misconceptions about the effectiveness of such programs have falsely influenced many people’s opinion on the subject.

You might also like

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.